{"id":3099,"date":"2022-01-22T15:09:31","date_gmt":"2022-01-22T15:09:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/?page_id=3099"},"modified":"2022-01-22T15:09:31","modified_gmt":"2022-01-22T15:09:31","slug":"different-scientific-views-on-the-boundaries-of-the-body-construct","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/?page_id=3099","title":{"rendered":"Different Scientific Views on the Boundaries of the \u2018Body\u2019 Construct"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2 lang=\"en-US\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\" align=\"justify\"><span lang=\"bg-BG\">Radeya Gesheva<\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"western\" lang=\"en-US\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\" align=\"justify\"><span lang=\"bg-BG\">Sofia University<\/span>\u00a0<span lang=\"bg-BG\">\u2018St. Kliment Ohridski<\/span>\u2019<\/p>\n<p class=\"western\" lang=\"en-US\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\" align=\"justify\">E-mail:\u00a0<a href=\"mailto:rgesheva@uni-sofia.bg\"><span lang=\"it-IT\">rgesheva<\/span><span lang=\"bg-BG\">@<\/span>uni<span lang=\"bg-BG\">\u2013<\/span>sofia<span lang=\"bg-BG\">.<\/span>bg<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"western\" lang=\"it-IT\" align=\"justify\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"bg-BG\"><b><span style=\"font-size: small;\"><strong><span lang=\"en-GB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rhetoric.bg\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Gesheva-R-issue-50-January-2022-p.91-101.pdf\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-8644 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/rhetoric.bg\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/1200px-PDF_file_icon.svg_.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"90\" height=\"110\" \/><\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/span>Abstract<\/b><\/span><span lang=\"bg-BG\">: The article presents different points of view about the boundaries of the <\/span>\u2018<span lang=\"bg-BG\">body<\/span>\u2019<span lang=\"bg-BG\"> construct. The emphasis is on building the body from a theoretical point of view, presenting two main theories: <\/span>the power and the feminism theory<span lang=\"bg-BG\">. Their essential aspects provide the tools for analysis and evaluation of the construction from a literary and philosophical <\/span>perspective<span lang=\"bg-BG\">, with a focus on literature. After a critical review, the main postulates in both theories are derived and definitions of the body are presented. Based on the planning of the ideas about the body, the projections and the reflections that <\/span>power<span lang=\"bg-BG\"> has <\/span>had <span lang=\"bg-BG\">on this construct, the analysis of its reaction<\/span> is analysed<span lang=\"bg-BG\">. Examples <\/span>derived from some<span lang=\"bg-BG\"> literary,<\/span> philosophical and rhetorical <span lang=\"bg-BG\">works are given, studying the transformations of the body. The behavio<\/span>u<span lang=\"bg-BG\">r and the different types of strategies in which the construct is applied are studied. As a result of the review, the steps that are fundamental for the process of forming the <\/span>\u2018body\u2019<span lang=\"bg-BG\"> construct<\/span> <span lang=\"bg-BG\">are presented.<\/span> <span lang=\"bg-BG\">Otherness is brought out through the prism of philosophy, with the body presented in relation to the categories of freedom and writing. The body is not only a mirror of <\/span>an epoch<span lang=\"bg-BG\">, but also a means of exercising control over situations. In literary terms, the body is presented as a site and field for raising questions about identity, belonging and freedom. The assumption is that the approach to male and female perspectives is too binary.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"western\" lang=\"it-IT\" align=\"justify\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"bg-BG\"><b>Key words<\/b><\/span><span lang=\"bg-BG\">: Body, Body<\/span>\u2019s<span lang=\"bg-BG\"> boundaries, <\/span>c<span lang=\"bg-BG\">onstruct, Theory of power, Theory of presence, Italian literature.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"western\" lang=\"it-IT\" align=\"justify\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\">Rhetoric and Communications Journal, issue 50, January 2022<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"western\" lang=\"it-IT\" align=\"justify\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rhetoric.bg\/%d1%80%d0%b0%d0%b7%d0%bb%d0%b8%d1%87%d0%bd%d0%b8-%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d1%87%d0%bd%d0%b8-%d0%b3%d0%bb%d0%b5%d0%b4%d0%bd%d0%b8-%d1%82%d0%be%d1%87%d0%ba%d0%b8-%d0%b7%d0%b0-%d0%b3%d1%80%d0%b0%d0%bd%d0%b8\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\">Read the Original in Bulgarian<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Radeya Gesheva Sofia University\u00a0\u2018St. Kliment Ohridski\u2019 E-mail:\u00a0rgesheva@uni\u2013sofia.bg Abstract: The article presents different points of view about the boundaries of the \u2018body\u2019 construct. The emphasis is on building the body from a theoretical point of view, presenting two main theories: the power and the feminism theory. Their essential aspects provide the tools for analysis and evaluation [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3099","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3099","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3099"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3099\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3100,"href":"https:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3099\/revisions\/3100"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3099"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}