{"id":3037,"date":"2021-10-29T08:51:30","date_gmt":"2021-10-29T08:51:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/?page_id=3037"},"modified":"2021-10-29T08:51:30","modified_gmt":"2021-10-29T08:51:30","slug":"features-of-argumentation-in-political-rhetoric-during-the-civil-dissatisfaction-in-bulgaria-in-2020","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/?page_id=3037","title":{"rendered":"Features of Argumentation in Political Rhetoric during the Civil Dissatisfaction in Bulgaria in 2020"},"content":{"rendered":"<p align=\"justify\">\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\" align=\"justify\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\"><b>Gabriela Mihailova<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\" align=\"justify\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\">Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\" align=\"justify\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\">e-mail: <\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"color: #0563c1;\"><a href=\"mailto:gabi.mihailova@gmail.com\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\">gabi.mihailova@gmail.com<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\"><b><span lang=\"bg-BG\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rhetoric.bg\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Mihailova-G-issue-49-October-2021-p.35-51.pdf\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-8644 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/rhetoric.bg\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/1200px-PDF_file_icon.svg_.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"105\" height=\"129\" \/><\/a><\/span>Abstract: <\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\">The aim of this article is to highlight the defining traits of political rhetoric, presidential and state-political, in the events of protests and civil dissatisfaction in Bulgaria in 2020. The methodology includes both rhetorical and discursive analysis. Speeches of representatives of state institutions have been selected for this research and more precisely &#8211; of the Prime Minister and the President<\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\">. The <\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\">main<\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\"> hypothesis is that in cases of extreme opposition during growing civil dissatisfaction, political figures use a diversity of rhetorical techniques depending on their personal characteristics. The political vocabulary varies from specific terminology <\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\">to slang and colloquialism. Their political argumentation aims to prove their own thesis with a diversity of arguments while demonstrating conviction and faith; to reject the opponent\u2019s thesis and to prove <\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\">their<\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\"> arguments wrong. The analysis concludes that there is strong contrast <\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\">on<\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\"> personal and institutional levels<\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\">. The polarisation in opinions is strong and fluctuates thus not being able to define a clear winner out of the crisis.<\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\"> The speaker often does not achieve persuasion of the opponent. The speakers aim to influence different social groups in Bulgaria while the protests and civil dissatisfaction were at their highest.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\"><b>Key words: <\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\">arguments, argumentation, political rhetoric, presidential rhetoric, state-political discourse, protests.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\">Rhetoric and Communications Journal, issue 49, October 2021<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rhetoric.bg\/%d0%be%d1%81%d0%be%d0%b1%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%be%d1%81%d1%82%d0%b8-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%b0%d1%80%d0%b3%d1%83%d0%bc%d0%b5%d0%bd%d1%82%d0%b0%d1%86%d0%b8%d1%8f%d1%82%d0%b0-%d0%b2-%d0%bf%d0%be%d0%bb%d0%b8%d1%82\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"en-GB\">Read the Original in Bulgarian <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gabriela Mihailova Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski e-mail: gabi.mihailova@gmail.com Abstract: The aim of this article is to highlight the defining traits of political rhetoric, presidential and state-political, in the events of protests and civil dissatisfaction in Bulgaria in 2020. The methodology includes both rhetorical and discursive analysis. Speeches of representatives of state institutions have been [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3037","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3037","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3037"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3037\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3038,"href":"https:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3037\/revisions\/3038"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3037"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}