{"id":2440,"date":"2019-11-04T20:07:41","date_gmt":"2019-11-04T20:07:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/?p=2440"},"modified":"2019-11-04T20:07:41","modified_gmt":"2019-11-04T20:07:41","slug":"ancient-indian-version-of-argumentation-in-a-debate-the-logical-schematism-of-catuskoti","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/?p=2440","title":{"rendered":"Ancient Indian version of argumentation in a debate (the logical schematism of \u201ccatuskoti\u201d)"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2 class=\"western\" lang=\"en-GB\" align=\"justify\"><span lang=\"en-US\">Stanislava Rasheva<\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"western\" lang=\"en-GB\" align=\"justify\"><span lang=\"bg-BG\">Sofia University \u201cSt. Kliment Ohridski\u201d, PhD student<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"western\" lang=\"en-GB\"><span lang=\"en-US\">e-mail<\/span><span lang=\"bg-BG\">:\u00a0<\/span><u><a href=\"mailto:srasheva@gmail.com\"><span lang=\"en-US\">srasheva@gmail.com<\/span><\/a><\/u><\/p>\n<p class=\"western\" lang=\"en-GB\" align=\"justify\"><span lang=\"bg-BG\"><b><a href=\"http:\/\/rhetoric.bg\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Rasheva-S-India-Argum-issue-41-October-2019-final.pdf\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-7227 alignleft\" src=\"http:\/\/rhetoric.bg\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/14.1.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 108px) 100vw, 108px\" srcset=\"http:\/\/rhetoric.bg\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/14.1.png 256w, http:\/\/rhetoric.bg\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/14.1-150x150.png 150w\" alt=\"\" width=\"108\" height=\"108\" \/><\/a><\/b><\/span><b><\/b><\/p>\n<p class=\"western\" lang=\"en-GB\" align=\"justify\"><b>Abstract<\/b>:<span lang=\"bg-BG\">\u00a0The article reveals the specifics of the first form of theoretical argumentation during a debate in the ancient Indian spiritual tradition. It presents the evolution of this technology in the Buddhist tradition and explains the importance of this approach for the emergence of the first categories in Indian philosophy. The analysis is based on original sources.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"western\" lang=\"en-GB\" align=\"justify\"><span lang=\"bg-BG\"><b>Keywords<\/b><\/span><span lang=\"bg-BG\">: prephilosophy; Sanjaya,\u00a0<\/span><span lang=\"en-US\">Budha,<\/span><span lang=\"bg-BG\">\u00a0Naagaarjuna, catuskoti, public disputes, philosophical dispute,\u00a0<\/span><span lang=\"en-US\">c<\/span><span lang=\"bg-BG\">atuskoti<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span lang=\"bg-BG\"><a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"http:\/\/rhetoric.bg\/intercultural-communication-literature-argumentation-%d0%b4%d1%80%d0%b5%d0%b2%d0%bd%d0%be%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%b4%d0%b8%d0%b9%d1%81%d0%ba%d0%b8-%d0%b2%d0%b0%d1%80%d0%b8%d0%b0%d0%bd%d1%82-%d0%bd%d0%b0\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\">Read the Original in Bulgarian<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Stanislava Rasheva Sofia University \u201cSt. Kliment Ohridski\u201d, PhD student e-mail:\u00a0srasheva@gmail.com Abstract:\u00a0The article reveals the specifics of the first form of theoretical argumentation during a debate in the ancient Indian spiritual tradition. It presents the evolution of this technology in the Buddhist tradition and explains the importance of this approach for the emergence of the first [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2440","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2440","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2440"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2440\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2440"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2440"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/journal.rhetoric.bg\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2440"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}